United States | News & Politics

7253 readers

306 users here now

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Canada issues travel advisory for LGBTQ+ residents visiting US (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In a statement to CNN, the global affairs department of the Canadian government said: "Since the beginning of 2023, certain states in the US have passed laws banning drag shows and restricting the transgender community from access to gender affirming care and from participation in sporting events."

Canada has provided specific guidelines to its LGBTQ+ citizens traveling abroad: "Watch for laws that: criminalize same-sex activities and relationships [and] criminalize people based on their sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression and sex characteristics."

"Some countries may use laws related to 'vagrancy', 'public nuisance' or 'public morals' to criminalize 2SLGBTQI+ people."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, there's a lot to be said for the important part, notably how it shouldn't be an advisory for the United States GENERALLY, but rather certain, specific (red) states.

I'm certain the West coast would welcome Canadians of all stripes. Gulf coast? Eh... erm... em...

[–] skye 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Literally the beginning of the article makes it clear Canada is refering to "certain states" and it's repeated through the entire article. You just came here to crack a joke in poor taste and didn't even bother reading the article lol.

LGBTQ+ citizens are at risk when traveling to the US due to numerous discriminatory laws passed at state level, the Canadian government has warned.

“Some states have enacted laws and policies that may affect 2SLGBTQI+ persons. Check relevant state and local laws,” the government’s website reads.

Also as someone from outside the U.S., I'd understand it even if the advising was country-wide and not state specific. But it isn't.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

I started reading the article in good faith and was jarred out of it by a term that even among first nations is not universally accepted:

https://rewirenewsgroup.com/2016/10/13/two-spirit-tradition-far-ubiquitous-among-tribes/

https://objectnow.org/debunking-the-two-spirit-myth/

But in the end, I think this discussion has ended up educating people so it's a win.