this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
2240 points (94.3% liked)

World News

39364 readers
3104 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] solstice 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I spoke with a far left friend of mine about this. His position essentially boiled down to the risk of a massive nuclear disaster outweighed the benefits. I said what about the known disastrous consequences of coal and oil? Didn't really have a response to that. It doesn't make sense to me. I'll roll those dice and take the .00001% chance risk or whatever.

[–] normalmighty 15 points 1 year ago

Yeah, nuclear is to fossil fuels as planes are to cars, safety wise. Sure it's a huge deal when an accident occurs, but that's because accidents are drastically more rare.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nuclear is fantastic and would have been even more fantastic 30 years ago. But it's 2023 and renewables are getting better every day. There's just no real reason to not invest primarily in green energy sources, especially when the track record on nuclear waste management is abysmal. People will say "oh but the resources, oh but the storage, oh but the blah blah blah". We act like these things can't be done, but they are being done all over the place. While the US argues about whether solar is viable, China has almost produced more solar panels in a year than the US has ever produced. And they are planning to try and deliver to other countries with less productive capacity as well.

[–] solstice 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I love the nuclear waste storage argument. Wouldn't it be grand if we could just stick it in the atmosphere like we do with coal and oil? Smh...

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thing is bad, therefore other things that's not as bad is good. Yo your brain is fucking melted lmao

[–] solstice 1 points 1 year ago

8 day old account, second post is to be an asshole to me for no reason. Classy. You’re either a bot or another shitty lemming. You’ll fit right in here with all the other insufferable shitheads in this forum.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've heard some people worry that it can be used for weapons. idk.

[–] solstice 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ironic argument for someone in a country where you can buy actual assault weapons over the counter, isn't it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It wasn't clear they were from the authoritarian regime of Hamburgerland.

[–] solstice 2 points 1 year ago

You're right my bad. I know Americans are pretty bad about that on the Internet. I try not to be but in my defense I was thinking about that friend and projected him onto your comment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No new assault weapons have been manufactured for sale to civilians since the 80's.

[–] solstice 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I researched and it turns out no fully automatic weapons have been available for a few decades now. Tightly controlled. Semi automatic is just as lethal though. Also apparently the las vegas shooter in 2018 use bump stocks on his semi automatics which makes it pseudo automatic if you'll pardon the pun. Notably, the DOJ announced this bump stock reg in 2018, under the Trump administration. Interesting, but not surprising, that the insane right didn't lose their shit about "muh gunz" when it happened under Trump's reign.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Nah the reason people didn't make much noise about bump stocks is because they're terrible. They are purely something you might do for entertainment rather than any serious attempt to shoot; they really hurt accuracy and comfort.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The term "assault weapon" is doing some very heavy lifting there. Care to define it?