Brisbane

962 readers

5 users here now

Home of the bin chicken. Visit our friends:

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

It often gets a bad rap, but fans of the recorder say the instrument's reputation is undeserved (www.abc.net.au)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The recorder is often seen as the daggy instrument you first played at primary school.
But a small group of 50-somethings are doing all they can to change the reputation of the well-known instrument.
Each Friday in the middle of Brisbane's CBD, the women come together to play recorders of all shapes and sizes.

As someone who has lived next door to primary school aged children who were very conscientious about practising their recorder, I feel this quote deep in my soul:

"I thought recorders were simple enough especially since they play them in primary schools.
"Little did I know, it's easy to make a note, it's not easy to play well."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It depends what you're using to classify the beginning and end of periods in history and culture. The Middle Ages has been said to have lasted as late as 1500, with Baroque beginning as early as 1600, which would suggest at most a century between them. Within the context of classical music, that is a fairly short amount of time. If you were specifically focusing on music itself, those eras could begin and finish earlier as they aren't necessarily directly tied to other aspects of history.

Of course, human culture does not have hard transitions but rather gradually evolves over time, particularly when it comes to art, so even with the Renaissance separating the Baroque and Medieval eras of music there are still similarities between them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The precise starts and ends of musical periods are obviously fuzzy and any attempt to definitively say that this is where it is is inevitably going to be wrong.

That said, I still find it a fun conversation to have for its own sake. People naturally like to find ways to put things into discrete boxes. And as a rule of thumb, I've always used Monteverdi's L'Orfeo as the start of the Baroque, but I don't really have a marker for the start of the Renaissance. (For completeness, my usual marker for where Baroque music ends is the death of Bach, and the Romantic period starts with Beethoven's 3rd symphony—that last is the only one I feel particularly strongly about as more than just a convenient marker.)

But if we say 100 years, I don't agree that it's a short time. The entire common practice period lasted about 3 centuries, so a 1 century gap is pretty significant when you think about how much music evolved over that time. Obviously there are some notable similarities—particularly in timbre—between mediaeval and Baroque music. However—and maybe this is just my bias as someone whose study mostly focused on the common practice period and 20th century, and whose personal interest is mostly in the Romantic and 20th century—I think that the differences between the Baroque and mediaeval are pretty stark, with the Baroque having more in common with Classical and even Romantic eras.