this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
461 points (91.4% liked)

Atheism

4070 readers
7 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Badass_panda 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

It's not worse than religion, it just is religion. Treating religion like it's science only convinces those that want to be convinced.

... But making science into a religion makes you less likely to doubt what "science" says. Since doubt is the basis of empiricism, removing it from science destroys the utility of science... and that's bad.

[–] Not_Alec_Baldwin 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cool, then we agree.

When I say "science" I'm broadly referring to the scientific method, which is the assumption of a deep ignorance that can only be relieved by constant measurement and testing.

[–] Badass_panda 2 points 1 year ago

Yes; it is not something you should "believe in", which was my point. It isn't an alternative type of faith.

[–] Cryophilia 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But making science into a religion makes you less likely to doubt what “science” says.

I think there's a good argument to be made that there will inevitably be a subsection of the population that NEEDS to be told what to believe. They cannot function in a chaotic world.

And I think it's not a small minority either.

By treating science like religion we limit the harm that these people can do. If they dogmatically follow something, let them dogmatically follow "the science".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unfortunately these people can't distinguish actual science from bad science or completely made up things that claim to be based on science.

[–] Cryophilia 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, bad science is usually still better than good religion

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m curious, who are these people that treat science as a religion? Do you have any notable examples? I keep hearing about these people, but I have never seen them myself. I can’t help but feel like this is coming from religious people who would mistakenly say say that atheists have “faith” in science the way they have faith in a god.

[–] Badass_panda 1 points 1 year ago

No, I'm an atheist... I hear what you're saying, but this kind of person pops up all the time, some even on this thread iirc.

Think of the kind of person who, without thinking critically about it or making any attempt to understand it, blindly starts sentences with, "Science teaches us ___". No ability to differentiate scientific theory from pseudo scientific nonsense, and glad to half-remember something they learned poorly in high school to justify "through science" whatever crappy thing they want to do.

Think if many an intel screed about "females" and "evolutionary psychology" or the pseudo scientific racism of the 19th and early 20th centuries.

"Yes, but that's not actually science," I hear you say. Yes, that's the point; it's jumbled up dogma in service of being a dickhead, which is what I mean by "treating science like religion."