this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
-78 points (10.2% liked)
Privacy
32165 readers
980 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
But feds are selfish and lazy chodes and susceptible to (((bribery))). After all, the War on Terror has winded down and they constructed all these fusion centers for which they have no real use beyond targeting domestic dissidents. See Glenn Greenwald's critique of the new paradigm wherein DHS isn't as much concerned about foreign threats but more about domestic dissidents. Incels -- who only say they are romantically deprived and that emergent polygyny (women sharing Gorgeous Males) is not a non-factor -- have been deemed a threat on the flimsiest of pretenses because they (incels) give the jeebies to feminists and Jews who were supportive of the same Sexual Revolution that ultimately resulted in an incel class. The excerpt was written thirty years ago. It's gotten much worse. Why aren't incels then treated like a political party rather than as extremists? Who do the security agencies really serve? Why are some people so automatically trusting of them as if they aren't infallible and suspectable to influence while having selfish organizational interests?
Maybe you didn't understand what I meant. Like I said, regardless of what circumstances you're supposedly a part of, how and why would anyone on a public forum help you with a request like this? Just try to answer me two scenarios: a) if I do happen to know some magical way to make you invisible in the eyes of any security agency under the sun, how do I know that you're not a security agent yourself, trying to sniff out potential criminals? And b) even if I do decide to tell you of some such magic cyber-wand, why would you trust it instead of thinking that I'm trying to hack your device even further?
My point had nothing to do with what kind of person you are or what ideological fight you're taking part in (meaning all the justifications for the same you provided above are meaningless here), all I'm saying is that your approach to getting help is misguided. As for what a better approach would be, I think a few other comments here point towards that.
"how do I know you're not a security agent yourself?" I am legit the only person willing to say incels.is = DHS. Would a security agent say that? Incels.is = DHS. They've "interrupted" the incel scene, surreptitiously banned incel spaces in order to direct would be incel posters to spaces they control. The novelty of my perspective should give me credibility.
https://twitter.com/WrongedIncel