Education

140 readers

2 users here now

Posting Guidelines for our Education Community:

Be respectful: Treat all members with kindness and respect. Engage in constructive discussions and avoid personal attacks or offensive language.
Stay on-topic: Keep the discussions focused on educational topics. Avoid posting unrelated content or spamming the community.
Provide accurate information: Share reliable and credible sources when discussing educational topics. Avoid spreading misinformation or baseless claims.
No self-promotion: Refrain from excessive self-promotion or advertising. The community is for educational discussions, not for personal gain.
Use appropriate language: Avoid using vulgar or offensive language. Keep the discussions professional and inclusive.
Report rule violations: If you come across any rule violations, report them using the designated reporting system or contact the moderators directly.

Remember, as members of this community, it is our collective responsibility to maintain a positive and informative environment for everyone. Let's foster meaningful discussions and contribute to the growth of knowledge and learning.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

2tone

Judge rules parents can’t yank kids out of classes because they use books with gay characters (www.lgbtqnation.com)

submitted 1 year ago by 2tone to c/education

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mrginger 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gonna get downvoted to hell by saying this, but I didn't see anything about the books being banned in the linked article or the source article. As a matter of fact the school in question doubled down on keeping them. But, you could argue by pulling kids out of classes as a protest against said books being included in a curriculum is effectively trying to get them banned.

What I did read was a judge basically told some bigoted ass parents that no you can't opt your kids out of the classes whose curriculum go against your religious "morals". That, I don't agree with. That is a very sharp double edged sword that could be abused in so many ways.

[–] pivot_root 1 points 1 year ago

Suppose my religious morals were that evolution is a farce, condoms and responsible sex were akin to murder, and independent thought outside the church was frowned upon.

Would it still be a bad thing for the judge to rule against that? It's a slippery slope, but the line has to be drawn somewhere for the sake of the kids themselves.