this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2023
32 points (100.0% liked)
xkcd
8642 readers
3 users here now
A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Isn't that a bit backward? Compress in the cooler area, radiate heat, bring it inside and expand, absorb heat, then carry it outside.
If you were trying to cool a room like with an air conditioner, yes. Heat pumps literally work in reverse, bringing heat in more efficiently than any resistive heater. They output more heat energy than they use, as they are moving heat, not generating it.
They're not only for heating though, they can cool as well.
I guess I interpreted the comic backward; they're heating the room not cooling it.
Counterpoint, the only real difference between a heat pump and an air conditioner is the fact that with the former, you can choose which side is the condenser that gives off heat, and which side is the evaporator that absorbs it. With a basic airco, those sides are fixed. Most cheap aircos are more rudimentary heat pumps.
That's what I was thinking. Expansion/absorption happens in the air handler in the house, while compression/radiation happens outside.
For heating, it usually just turns on an electric coil in the air handler.
They work in reverse too. A heat pump can heat more efficiently than a resistance heater.