Photography

4916 readers

17 users here now

c/photography is a community centered on the practice of amateur and professional photography. You can come here to discuss the gear, the technique and the culture related to the art of photography. You can also share your work, appreciate the others' and constructively critique each others work.

Please, be sure to read the rules before posting.

THE RULES

Be nice to each other

This Lemmy Community is open to civil, friendly discussion about our common interest, photography. Excessively rude, mean, unfriendly, or hostile conduct is not permitted.

Keep content on topic

All discussion threads must be photography related such as latest gear or art news, gear acquisition advices, photography related questions, etc...

No politics or religion

This Lemmy Community is about photography and discussion around photography, not religion or politics.

No classified ads or job offers

All is in the title. This is a casual discussion community.

No spam or self-promotion

One post, one photo in the limit of 3 pictures in a 24 hours timespan. Do not flood the community with your pictures. Be patient, select your best work, and enjoy.

If you want contructive critiques, use [Critique Wanted] in your title.
Flair NSFW posts (nudity, gore, ...)
Do not share your portfolio (instagram, flickr, or else...)

The aim of this community is to invite everyone to discuss around your photography. If you drop everything with one link, this become pointless. Portfolio posts will be deleted. You can however share your portfolio link in the comment section if another member wants to see more of your work.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Why are tele converters so extremely expensive? (www.bhphotovideo.com)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I got the new Sony 70-200 mm F4 Macro G OSS II and it's amazing, even though very expensive. Anyway while looking at all those YouTube videos about it people were very often mention that it's compatible with tele converters and you'd get basically double the size lens (with half the light) + 1.0 macro instead of 0.5. Sounds amazing, and it looks like just a little bit of a short pipe which makes the lens to be a bit further away from the sensor.

I was thinking that it would be neat to get one, but when I looked at the prize, oh my god, $548. I don't get it, so what makes it so expensive?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] IMALlama 1 points 1 year ago

For DSLRs, Nikon's F-mount will give you a lens catalog dating back to the 60s if that's your criteria for choosing Canon. Unmotorized F-mount glass does require buying either a D7xxx or FF body if you want autofocus though.

In the mirrorless world, if you're on a budget E-mount is probably the way to go. Other than M43, it's one of the oldest mirrorless mounts and is also completely open, which gives you plenty of third party lens options.