this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
46 points (96.0% liked)

Linux

8258 readers
187 users here now

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.

  2. Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.

  3. Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.

  4. No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.

  5. No NSFW adult content

  6. Follow general lemmy guidelines.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Any effort that goes into making Linux more accessible is a worthwhile thing, so props to you for sitting down and putting this together.

That said, it wouldn't be a distro recommendation discussion with out at least some disagreement, so I guess I'll start the ball rolling!

In my view, the primary considerations for new users getting into Linux are:

  • How easy is it to find and select the live image I want to install?
  • How good is the out-of-the-box experience?
  • How much manual tinkering will I need to do to get everything working so I can get on with gaming/studying/whatever?
  • How easy will the OS be to maintain and is there a pre-installed system restore utility in case I break anything?

From this standpoint, distros like Pop OS! and Nobara are leaps and bounds ahead of Debian and Fedora, the former of which is infamous for having one of the least user friendly websites in the Linux distro world (and yes, it's better since Bookworm, but it's still a maze for new users to find the right Live image).

Sure, forks and downstream distros tend to add a bunch of extra software that may or may not be needed, but the overall utility and improved ease-of-use to new users greatly outweigh the drawback of having some extra packages that they don't end up using. The base distros are great if you only want free, non-proprietary software on your machine, but the average new user is much more concerned with having a working computer without having to dig around in config files and find the additional packages they need to install first.

Also, while Linux Mint is still a great distro, its lack of Wayland and multi-monitor support means it is falling behind and is no longer the automatic recommendation it once was, I would argue. Users with a newer machine are going to find distros that offer KDE Plasma or Gnome feel much more slick and modern than Mint does.

TL;DR - Debian and Fedora are not beginner-friendly distros and should not appear on any recommendation list for new users, IMHO. Pop OS! and Nobara are the safest and best two to recommend to most users right now, for my money, with Tumbleweed and Mint following along behind.

[–] atmur 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it would be a distro recommendation discussion with out at least some disagreement

I would be disappointed if there wasn't, lol

I actually put quite a bit of thought into how I wanted to go over forks/downstream distros, and I may have come to a weird conclusion but I decided discouraging them was the best option because:

  1. Distros like Manjaro/EndeavourOS are being described as "beginner friendly" when beginners should not be starting with anything Arch based. Listing out individual bad examples would just make the entire message more confusing.

  2. People will always google their question in the format of "distro name" + "problem". Someone with Linux experience using KDE Neon will know to google "ubuntu problem" because it's just Ubuntu, but a beginner will google "kde neon problem" and will find very few results. Alternatively, if they're using an upstream distro, that search will (probably) return lots of thorough results with more information on why exactly that problem occurred.

  3. Upstream is (generally) less likely to break than downstream, although this shouldn't be an issue for well managed downstream distros. But again, listing specific examples will make things more confusing.

Regarding Linux Mint and Wayland, I completely agree. I didn't know that Cinnamon/Mint still didn't support Wayland, so that should've moved Mint into the tentative recommendation category.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fair points all round.

I totally agree with #1, somewhat agree with #2, and somewhat disagree with #3.

For support, I would point to the fact that both Nobara and Pop OS! have very helpful communities and are quite good about directing users to use those channels to troubleshot problems rather than simply googling them.

As for upstream distros being generally less prone to breaking? I can't say that has aligned with my experience. My laptop had more issues with Fedora than any other distro I tested on it, and while Debian is definitely pretty solid in terms of stability, the age of the packages and the general unfriendliness of the user experience don't quite make up for it, in my opinion.

This is obviously why the question of "which is the best beginner distro?" remains a point of perpetual debate!