this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
1483 points (96.3% liked)

Memes

45915 readers
891 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kingshrubb 42 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Anyone have the numbers of social welfare spending vs corporate welfare spending for a recent year? Say 2020-2022? I can't find it.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm too lazy to look up the numbers, but I think the premise of this argument is rather weak.

Money spend on social welfare, vastly improves poor people's lives. When you spend it on corporate welfare, the money tends to go into the pockets of people who are already pretty comfortable.

This is a simplification of a multifaceted issue, but by and large I think this holds a lot more water than just comparing numbers.

Also: There was a pandemic in the time period given, so there might be some selection bias.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Means testing is something that wastes a lot of public welfare funds and is usually a tool utilized by those who want to cut programs as an example of welfares inability to work. If we got rid of means testing then corporate welfare would be shown for how truly useless it is. I'm not arguing with you or anything, just adding some more detail to the topic

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

It depends on what exactly you consider social welfare and corporate welfare. There's all sorts of ways to split the data.

[–] loom_in_essence 0 points 1 year ago

Let's be more specific and find out how much public money was spent on sugarry snacks for fat people, which is his ridiculous complaint. I'll assume we're not psychopaths who are generally against a social safety net.