this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
1388 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59596 readers
2896 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Maybe you could get an AI to write a better argument. The hammer doesn't steal others work to make its own.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You could train a LLM using only your own art, and then generate art that is based solely on your own. Do you not own that AI generated art?

[–] EmptySlime 1 points 1 year ago

The way I understand it if you did that and tried to take just the raw AI output and get a copyright on it you couldn't based on this ruling. But if it was one of the tools you used to create a piece of art even if it was just editing and making small changes to it to suit your creative vision based on what the AI put out then you could. It sounds like the judge is mainly talking about works solely generated by AI.

Also my understanding was that this guy was trying to get the AI generator itself to be considered the author for the things it generated for the purposes of copyright. Which would theoretically transfer to whatever entity is running the AI because of the "Work for Hire" clause.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Did you steal other's work to learn how to write that sentence?

[–] ClamDrinker 1 points 1 year ago

It's a good thing they weren't making an argument then - but asking a (flawed) question. Just like comparing machine learning to stealing is a flawed comparison.