this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
1034 points (98.3% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

2906 readers
8 users here now

Rules:

Rules subject to change, have a pleasant flight

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
TheTechnician27
1034
Purchasers of worthless digital monkeys sue worthless digital monkey auction house after realizing that worthless digital monkeys are worthless (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by LeanFemurs to c/leopardsatemyface
106 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The Sotheby's auction house has been named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed by investors who regret buying Bored Ape Yacht Club NFTs that sold for highly inflated prices during the NFT craze in 2021.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BreadstickNinja 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm not missing your point, I just disagree with it. A signed print is physically distinct from a copy. If an artist personally spent extra time with a particular piece to sign it, adding another personal touch on their creation, I would think that legitimately adds value.

An NFT does not do that. All an NFT does is cause somebody's GPU to spin up and generate carbon emissions associated with the same literal string of zeros and ones that accompanies every other copy of the print. It doesn't represent any additional attention on the part of the creator. It's just a substandard copy that comes with excess waste.

[–] FrankFrankson 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

All an NFT does is cause somebody’s GPU to spin up and generate carbon emissions associated with the same literal string of zeros and ones that accompanies every other copy of the print. It doesn’t represent any additional attention on the part of the creator. It’s just a substandard copy that comes with excess waste.

None of that is true. You don't need a GPU to spin up to do anything. You are conflating mining crypto currency with NFTs. A NFT is just a cryptographic signature kept on some sort of blockchain that is associated with an image or file or unique pointer. You can use a preexisting blockchain or even make your own. Blockchains don't have to be mineable and blockchains themselves are actually a good idea.... mineable crypto currency is just a really shitty use case for them. It has nothing to do with mining and is just another form of cryptographic signature.

Edit: The fact that you think a physical signature has value while a unique digital signature (yes.. the signature is unique) has none is personal preference and once again not the point I am making. I am saying it is a type of signature and some collectors might find value in it.