this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
36 points (84.6% liked)

Media Criticism

4 readers
1 users here now

As a Marxist replacement of the /r/media_criticism subreddit.

Rules:

  1. When you post something that isn't direct media criticism, add a submission statement.

  2. Read the article before you comment.

  3. Stay civil, no slurs, no insults.

  4. No non-marxists.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
36
NY Times publishes hit job on anti-war activists; solidarity must be the answer (www.workers.org)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
48 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Unlike others, Singham actually did give away significant parts of his fortune. He gave it to leftist causes — and that’s why he, as well as his life partner Jodie Evans, a founder of Code Pink and a leading political activist, were targeted.

ETA: NYT Reveals That a Tech Mogul Likes China—and That McCarthyism Is Alive and Well

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alteon -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Yes, I'm literally the person pushing the buttons to drop bombs on people. You got it. Are you literally the guy that's genociding Uyghurs? You the one with the gun?

This is entirely pointless. Can't even discuss an article without immediately devolving to insults and racism. This is why lemmygrad is getting defederated, because of little, racist, pricks like you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyday you wake up and decide to repeat imperial propaganda whose aim is war, you are no different than the people who want the war. What war have these imperial stenographers drummed up support for that wasn't under false pretenses?

[–] Alteon 3 points 1 year ago

Point to me where exactly I decided to do this. Fucking link it to me. By all means, I'll wait.

But you won't. Because there isn't. It's so fucking convenient for you to label me as a supporter of imperialist propoganda because it means you don't actually have to respond to anything I've said.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Racism is when you participate in systemic oppression. Not when you get called cracker.

[–] Alteon 1 points 1 year ago

Oh, so we're conveniently redefining racism to fit our narratives are we? Racism no longer means the prejudice or discrimination of others anymore?

So if I called you by any sort of racial slur, that's not racist anymore? You have any idea how retarded that sounds?

So your telling me someone can call you a dirty, fucking and as long as they are not "participating in systemic oppression" then they wouldn't be racist? Ooookay.