this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
545 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

59198 readers
2866 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I thought the whole point of NFTs and the blockchain is that it's decentralized, and you can use "smart contracts" for things like this. How is one company able to decide to change it?

[–] PopularUsername 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Apparently, smart contracts are not contracts at all... they are friendly suggestions. Unsurprisingly a contract needs a mechanism to enforce it, which makes decentralized contracts redundant at best (as you still need institutions outside of the blockchain to monitor and enforce the contracts), and or worse, completely useless if there is no legal way to enforce them.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The idea behind smart contracts is that they contain code to verify that the contract is fulfilled (that’s the “smart” part of the name).

This of course also means that you can only use it for stuff that happens on the same blockchain, because the contract can’t verify anything outside of that.

Which is why this isn’t relevant for the real world, it’s just eating its own tail.

[–] PopularUsername 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah I was tempted to add a caveat, it does technically auto executive, but because it needs to interact with the real world it will always run into the oracle problem. The only solution to the oracle problem is courts and tort law, which makes the blockchain contract redundant and unnecessarily expensive.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They can only change it for their instance, but they can’t impact all NFT marketplaces. This is only significant because this company is the largest broker so it will impact more people.

Anyone can set up their own blockchain and build it however they want. Hell, they could make it centralized even.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not the question

The post you replied to was saying, "shouldn't it be inherent to the entry on the Blockchain, regardless of market"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You'd think it should be, but their contracts never enforced it in code