Privacy

32173 readers

353 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

180

BEWARE ! People who create fake email account to login to social media. (aussie.zone)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

55 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A facebook employee explained me how tracking works. Its not the email address Meta is concerned about. Its the IP, device identifiers and location. Meta doesnt care about the email at all apart from sending you emails for notification. Even with a fake email they exactly know who you are. Let's say you visit CNN.com which has facebook tracker. Facebook has the IP and the device identifiers. Now you login with fake email account on Instagram, facebook knows that's the IP ans the same device hence it "must" be the same person That's how facebook creates shadow profiles.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

That site says "Your browser has a unique fingerprint" even though I run Firefox, uBlock, Privacy Badger, and have privacy.resistFingerprinting set to true. My main problem may be plugins, once you have more than a few your set can be pretty unique.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Iirc unique != identifiable necessarily, because your fingerprint might be different while still unique the next time around.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Try going down the page and looking for the categories with more than a few bits of identifying information. I'm running LibreWolf with just uBlock Origin and Dark Reader (which I don't think influences results) and I'm able to get nearly-unique, instead of unique (but I do get unique on default settings). TBB gets non-unique, which is a good set of results to compare to.

In my case I noticed that my fonts were really unique so I set browser.display.use_document_fonts = 0. Also I use my WM to set my page resolution to 1920x1080, which seems to have a better fingerprint than the default LibreWolf floating resolution of 1600x900 (and even the letterboxing resolutions, from what I can tell).

I just spent some time testing again and checking for anything else. RFP does force a generic user agent, but unfortunately it keeps the version information and I can't figure out how to change it with RFP on. Would be nice to set it to the ESR version used by TBB (which has lower bits), but I'm not sure if that would lead to a more unique fingerprint (if, say, a feature was detected that is available in later versions but not ESR).

Edit: just tried Mullvad browser, and it's non-unique! Might be the best option.

[–] Byereddithellolemmy 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Try LibreWolf

Edit: interesting to see this was up voted, then downvoted. Would be good to understand why someone disagrees that LibreWolf would be a viable option here.