this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
324 points (87.2% liked)
Science
13262 readers
40 users here now
Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
that fluff piece is misrepresenting the contents of the study
I am sure you did your own research on the shitter. Much smart, such proof, many scientific.
you think i haven't seen the poore nemecek paper?
I think you are just a egoistical self centered science denier who has troubles with very simple concepts.
i think you don't understand science if you think the poore nemecek paper supports the fluff piece you referenced.
Please, go on, rebut the IPCC https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aba7357
I am sure I will see it in the news, backyard science that changes how we see the world are always hyped.
this, also, does not support the fluff piece you linked.