this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
752 points (94.1% liked)
Technology
59666 readers
3852 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
California passed its own net neutrality laws, but I think it only applies to ISPs.
Net Neutrality doesn't affect web sites and services, just how ISPs deliver content. Twitter doesn't have to remain neutral, they can block, throttle or redirect whatever they want. We need to stop pretending like they are a town square, they aren't and we shouldn't expect them to behave like they are.
I mean it's shitty, but they are allowed to do it and probably should be allowed to do it. They aren't a public space even if they like to pretend like they are. Opaquely slowing down access to sites they don't like is pretty sketchy, but you can imagine if I started a Twitter competitor I might decide that I want to block outgoing links to sites spreading misinformation like InfoWars or something like that.
The government probably shouldn't step in and force me to allow those outgoing links in the name of 'neutrality'. It would be my right to control what content is posted to the website that I run. It's probably more ethical if I tell people what I'm doing and why, but no one is required to be there.