this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
547 points (94.8% liked)
Asklemmy
43786 readers
841 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They may have had a chance to push it, but they didn't have the votes to pass it. Something that's overstated is how much control of congress the Democrats have had, specially in the Obama Administration. It's been said that they had 2 years, but they only had a few weeks between Senators being hospitalized, AL Fraken being seated and Ted Kennedy's replacement being seated. Something similar happened early this year with Feinstein (That's another topic all together) being hospitalized. Second, during the Obama admin they didn't have a party-platform mandate. Lieberman almost ran with McCain in 2008, he was only somewhat aligned with Democrats and is largely the reason we didn't get a public option. I'd like to see things move further left, but as you can see the current makeup of Congress doesn't allow it.
That was 50 years ago, and not at all uncommon of a feeling during the time. It's a product of his time, just look at how much worse it was across the isle. I don't think it should be held against an 80 year old when they have largely left those feelings in the past. None of us can know what thing future generations will judge us about in 50 years. Now someone of that age range that continued to feel that way you can judge. Personally I think it's wrong to continue to judge someone for their past actions once they correct it. You should incentivize people to change. If you endlessly criticize them it'll just make them stay the course and only associate with like minded people.
He made a dumb joke, but here's the full context
Yeah and that's a weird thing to say, doesn't make it any better
It's playful banter. The interviewer starts it with "you can't do that to Black Media" jokingly when he needs to leave, and his response is pointing out the obvious. The kind of Black people consuming Black Media aren't going to be voting for Trump, so it'll be ok that he has to leave. Biden isn't a great public speaker. He didn't word this one well. It wasn't a prepared statement, it was a response to other playfuyl banter. It's primarily been used against him by right wing media in false outrage.
I can't be bothered to care about playful banter. He's not redirecting government resources or ignoring folks that didn't vote for him like the last administration. The context above makes it clear what he meant too.
No, the person's intent matters entirely. It's the same issue with comedians making jokes. Some get a pass and some don't. It's all about knowing the person's actual feelings, intent, and historical actions. Dave Chapelle and Kevin Hart received significant pushback from their statements on Trans and Gay people respectively because neither had shown to support either group prior to saying them. Hart, to his credit, has eventually learned why his statements were hurtful and has corrected his behavior (Side note the docuseries on Netflix? i think is pretty great. It covers part of this where he is extremely bullheaded about needing to apologize and how going on Ellen should have been enough, and members of his staff do show him why he's wrong. Overall the series is sort of tragic as his motives are at odds with his family and I came away feeling sad for him more than anything).
If Biden is racist, he's not showing it in any meaningful way today. Republicans don't get the benefit of doubt because their policies are already anti-black. You may want to judge everything separately, but that's not how it works. If someone does or says 9 racists things, it's safe to assume the 10th thing is racist too.
I’m not going to reply to cherry picked quotes with no context. I’ve already said he’s not a great speaker, he’s 80 years old, and he’s changed from the past. His policies now are what I care about. Saying dumb things off the cuff isn’t the same as doing things actively to hurt blacks or minorities. If he was saying those things and actively harming those people he would be criticized all the same. Context matters.
It shouldn’t surprise me that you’re making binary judgement calls on me when you’re doing it to Biden. I never said Democrats don’t need to get better. I never said Biden was my first choice, that I support a majority of his ideas, or anything like that. I simply reject attacking him for things in the past that he’s corrected in the present when the alternative is active harm.
Further, I didn’t choose team blue. Team red stopped being an option for me, so my upbringing of red-leaning purple turned blue by default. My primary concern is not letting anti-democratic fascists gain power. I can’t be bothered not picking off the cuff comments made in the past (his kids are in their 50s for fucks sake).
I’ve been quite clear. You’re either acting in bad faith or are incapable of nuanced discussion. Either way, I’m leaving it here.