this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
17 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1435 readers
135 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Pretty soon, paying for all the APIs you need to make sure your Midjourney images are palatable will be enough to pay a human artist!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

bro just one more AI company bro, bro I swear just one more AI company and we'll reach singularity bro

Unrelatedly I just unlocked a core memory: I learned about the "signularity" (sic, misspelled as a joke) from the webcomic questionable content. Why do I remember that?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

speaking of which: sweep.dev

Sweep's Core Algorithm - Using Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) to clear your GitHub Backlog

At Sweep, our core issue-to-pull-request pipeline resolves around an RAG-based pipeline. This means we retrieve snippets from a corpora (your codebase) and feed it to an language model (GPT-4) to generate code.

a wondrous automaton crafting branch and PR for every badly-written and/or outdated entry in your n-many github repositories! with in-built violation-of-boundaries!

true perfection, this will go absolutely perfectly. I have no notes.

[edit: this should possibly even be its own thread]

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What the fuck? Is that a parody? People are mocking dumb LLM ideas, right? Right?!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I certainly am mocking this, but that thing appears to be a whole-ass startup.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I mean, my background in support is showing here... if an issue was submitted that was clear enough for someone to fix it, it would be fixed[1] (i.e. "there's a bug in file X, line Y, the comparison is strictly less than but should be less or equal"). By definition, the ones that are left are those that are unclear, nonsensical, off-topic or all too often all 3.


[1] modulo developer laziness

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There’s also “used to matter, but then things changed and we just never got to this because it’s 200+ things deep in the backlog” etc kind of situations

Anyway, I look forward to hearing about someone using this and something going catastrophically wrong

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I can replace this product with a script that just closes them as "works as designed WONTFIX"