this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
394 points (95.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43989 readers
1328 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Obsidian for note taking, Bitwig studio for audio recording and processing.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

TIL Obsidian isn't FOSS!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Did you check logseq? It's on flathub

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am using logseq at work, as I don't have a license there. I prefer Obsidian over all alternatives I've tried so far. Major points are:

  • Plugins, which obsidian offers a lot
  • File structure, obsidian stores all notes in a directory tree of markdown files. You can sync this with any service you like: GIT, Syncthing, manually, whatever you like.
  • I don't really get the journaling format of logseq, why does every note have to be a point in a hierarchy?
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I really like the obsidian file structure. It makes me feel more secure because even though Obsidian isn't FOSS, all my files are backed up and in my control. Sure, my various plugin nick-nacks and doo-dads would stop working if I had to migrate everything away from Obsidian, but the meat of the content would still be there

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

logseq definitely coming along. I tried their donation only sync and it seems to mostly work.

That said nothing has beaten Standardnotes for me. Standardnotes can be found on flathub, fdroid etc. The only drawback is to get the important features you need to either selfhost or buy the plan. The free service is very barebones

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Absolutely love Obsidian.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

isn’t obsidian open source?

[–] finestnothing 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nope it's not. It's free, but you can only look at part of the source code and can't look at the proprietary parts. Logseq is completely FOSS though

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

damn, that’s kind of a bummer since i love it so much. logseq looks exciting, how does it compare to obsidian feature-wise?

[–] finestnothing 3 points 1 year ago

Tbh, it's a different philosophy for taking notes. There is overlap in features, but also a lot of differences.

In obsidian, everything is file based, you manage the folder system, and you primarily link files together.

In logseq, it's more based around blocks which are indented portions of the content. You can still make files and link to the file itself rather than a block, but a lot of your notes will be on your journal pages and link to other blocks/days/content/tags, etc. I prefer logseq to obsidian, but it's a very different file setup type than normal since you normally don't worry about individual files and keeping track of them, you can just link to the content later. You can still make separate files though, and they work well. The focus is just on blocks rather than files

Both have note linking and embedding (logseqs is better imo), graph view, searching, plugins, themes, etc. I'd say they're on par in terms of features, it's just whichever notes system you prefer and work better with tbh

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It is closed source. I haven seen any partial source code anywhere either. Licensing is very generous: free forever for personal use, you only need to get a license at 50$ per year if you are a commercial user. There is also a 2 week trial for commercial users.

Of course, besides legality, there is nothing stopping you from using obsidian for commercial things, they don't do any checking for that stuff.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bitwig is outstanding. I so wish there was an open source DAW that came close in stability and workflow. Zrythm crashes constantly, and the workflow in Ardour is obtuse. I can't quite figure out how to do anything in LMMS and the other options just look so dated I'm not even tempted to try them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I've heard that many swear by reaper. I once started it and couldn't figure out the UI at all, and the UI design just felt ancient. Didn't give it another chance after that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I love Bitwig. Linux support too!

[email protected] is dead but I'm hoping to change that soon!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm checking the community out. Bitwig has a great look and feel, and they support native Linux with many audio systems. It's something worth my bucks.

The rule no tux no bux applies in reverse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I did rent to own via Splice so I get two years of updates for the price of one (just spread out).