this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
135 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

60126 readers
3105 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Apple has plowed over $500 billion into stock buybacks since 2012 — more than Visa, JPMorgan, or Exxon are worth::Only eight companies in the S&P 500 have larger market values than Apple's outlay on share repurchases over the last decade.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dirkle -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why? It's a perfectly reasonable thing to do. The company sold stock to raise money. No reason they shouldn't be able to buy back the stock they sold with the money they made.

[–] EmperorGormet 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They didn’t sell stock to raise money to buy their stock, that doesn't make sense. They sell stock when they feel they need cash and/or they think they are fair/over valued. They buy stock when they have excess cash and/or feel they are undervalued. They also have to disclose both sales and purchases beforehand.

[–] dirkle 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I can see how my reply could be interpreted that way but that was not the intention. I meant they sell stock to raise money to fund their business, expansions, etc. Not to raise money just to buy their stock back.