this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
324 points (90.1% liked)

Privacy

32173 readers
784 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm surprised that Vivaldi isn't more popular next to Brave tbh.

You get Chromium with a bunch of other features if you want them, but no crypto crap. They even run their own Mastodon instance with built-in functionality out of the box.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's closed source, which is a big turn off for a lot of people. I do prefer Vivaldi though, largely because their business model is vastly superior. Employee owned and self funded vs crypto/advertising/investor mix? Easy choice.

EDIT: To be clear, I still use Firefox 99.99% of the time. Vivaldi and Brave are only competing for that 0.01% where I have a problem with Firefox on a particular website and can't find a solution.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Vivaldi has way worse adblock compared to Brave. Not a replacement.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Brave's ad-blocker is better than uBlock Origin?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There are some places where yes. Brave has VERY good, balanced ad blocker built-in.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I guess my point was that adding uBlock Origin to Vivaldi is a simple 5 second process, so the claim that it is unsuitable as a replacement for Brave because the default ad/tracker blocker is less effective seems kind of pointless.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

By default, sure. But uBlock is way more powerful when you configure it. Seriously, take a look at their wiki. I doubt that Brave lets you choose exactly which domains to connect to on a per-site basis. And do you really want an advertising company to make your adblocker? They’ve done shadier stuff.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Their point is to be an ethical ad company. So i still kinda trust them. Also, I use Firefox + uBlock Origin on Hard Mode both on PC and Android. Brave has really good, balanced ad blocker which does not break sites but block ads and trackers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Why wouldn't you just install uBlock Origin on them though?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Is vivaldi still closed-source?