this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
24 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5189 readers
795 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
24
The U.S. Government Will Pay to Remove Carbon From Atmosphere (heatmap.news)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Article is subject to a paywall, which can be bypassed by clearing cookies for the site, and registering with a made-up email address (it's checked for syntax but nothing else)

I'll note that this is a tiny and incredibly expensive part of what needs to happen

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They should do it with ocean water instead, as water has 50x's more carbon than the atmosphere.

Also, fossil fuels companies are going to cite the work funded by the government to continue spewing pollution. Mark my words.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would that be done through mineralizing the carbon that's dissolved in the water? I remember hearing about some mineral you could spread in the water that would react with the carbon. I wonder what it would take to produce and spread that at scale with a low re-emission rate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

There is discussion around enhanced rock weathering, but none of it is a proved technology at this point, even at pilot scale, in the way that direct air capture is.

[–] TokenBoomer 1 points 1 year ago

That’s a bingo!