this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
1192 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59612 readers
3908 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Incandescent light bulbs are officially banned in the U.S.::America’s ban on incandescent light bulbs, 16 years in the making, is finally a reality. Well, mostly.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] beigegull 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because imagining that someone might have a legitimate reason to want a product or service that a regulator might not have thought of is currently a "Republican" trait in the US.

[–] tired_n_bored 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Does anybody use incandescent light bulbs as radiators? Because it's the only alternative use I can think of.

In the European Union we banned them 10 years ago and people just continued their lives. I wish people were as mad when books get banned, but sadly it's not the case

[–] beigegull 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Does anybody use incandescent light bulbs as radiators?

Yes. I've done it personally a couple times.

Because it's the only alternative use I can think of.

The thing about alternative uses is that they're still real even if you can't think of them.

Broad bans are a bad policy tool in general. Even if you believe in the progressive ideal of expert regulators making broad societal policies, a simple thought experiment shows the problem: What would it take to do the study to accurately determine all the negative effects of a ban? Not guessing, not wishful thinking, but really collecting and analyzing the information.

I wish people were as mad when books get banned, but sadly it's not the case

When was the last time the US federal government banned a book?

[–] tired_n_bored 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Thank you. What is the usage of using them as a radiator? Am I wrong or does it seem quite inefficient?

Regarding your last question: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021%E2%80%932023_book_banning_in_the_United_States

[–] tired_n_bored 1 points 1 year ago

The link seems broken even if I copy-paste it? Wtf. It's a Wikipedia article titled " 2021–2023 book banning in the United States"

[–] beigegull 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Once you're doing resistive heating any resistive element is just as efficient as any other. Incandescent light bulbs have three advantages: They are cheap, easy to work with, and it's really obvious when one is turned on.

As for your link, it's talking about arguments about which books should be made available at school and local libraries. In no sense is that even related to the federal government banning books.

[–] tired_n_bored 1 points 1 year ago

Well I've never said the US federal government is banning books, but I wish people were as mad when their local schools and libraries do that :-)

[–] WindInTrees -1 points 1 year ago

And what is that legitimate reason here?