this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
985 points (96.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

9805 readers
268 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bonnetbee 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you take my city as an example: everything is build around cars, we don't have any bike lanes. To fix this, they painted those dottet lines on the road, easy to ignore for drivers.

The knowledge that they have to take away space from car infrastructure to repurpose it for sidewalks and bikelanes would be a huge step, because there is simply no other solution. Every expertise the city ordered is saying it, but they still won't except the facts and try to weasel out with those painted bike lanes.

So in general you are right, one shouldn't be happy when your gain is based on another beings loss. But in infrastructure planing terms it would simply make the city a better place for everyone.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The fact car infrastructure was built in cities is usually already based on a loss for others. This is just taking it back.

[–] Fried_out_Kombi 4 points 1 year ago

Exactly. They demolished entire historic, dense neighborhoods and displaced countless hundreds of thousands to build freeways. They took all the streets away from pedestrians and cyclists and streetcars and gave it to cars, save for a tiny sliver of sidewalk. And cars are the most space-inefficient mode of transit, mind you.

All this is doing is reclaiming a little bit of that space back.