this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
106 points (63.1% liked)

Technology

60084 readers
4914 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

oh boy everyone will argue about audio specifications again. For the record standard MP3 is fine and is perfectly representative of the recording it did within the bandwidth of human hearing

[–] klyde 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That depends on which MP3 though. Is it 128kbps? Because that's dog shit. 192 will sound fine to most. I don't go below 256 and that's only if I can't get 320.

[–] felixwhynot 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

256 is solid but V0 is the best balance of size and quality for me. I also respect V2 for the smaller but still quality 192kbps VBR files

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Anybody using a 30 year old encoder instead of opus really isn't trying when it comes to lossy audio.

[–] felixwhynot 1 points 1 year ago

Well damn now I have to AB test some codecs

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I should have specified CD-quality audio anyone that’s seen a deep fried jpeg should know why you don’t compress a mp3 too much