this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
19 points (100.0% liked)

Photography

4603 readers
58 users here now

A community to post about photography:

We allow a wide range of topics here including; your own images, technical questions, gear talk, photography blogs etc. Please be respectful and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I want to take wildlife/outdoor photos recreationally. I don't want to get frustrated by photo quality, but I also don't want to spend more than I need to. That being said I'm willing to consider expensive equipment, but only if it benefits my needs. Does anyone have some canned recommendations?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stochasticity 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm sure you are right that I would get better recommendations if I specify how much I'm willing to spend. Honestly though I would like to hear where people think the sweet spot is and I was worried I would miss that input if I set a budget.

Also I haven't fully decided what that budget would be.

[–] Photographer 2 points 1 year ago

There is no sweet spot, either get the best used kit you can find (lots of people buy stuff for a hobby or gift and barely use it), or go and get the nicest new kit you can afford to buy. The lenses for birding increase in value exponentially as you go up the range, a starter lens might be $300, a good amateur lens $1000, a pro lens $2500 and a top of the line National Geographic type lens $7000-20000

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

As the other poster said, there's no real sweet spot, but I'd think the floor would be like US$1k for something that's very competent and versatile.