Brexit

356 readers

1 users here now

A place to debate and discuss the UK's exit from the European Union. Be Kind and Courteous.

[email protected] [email protected]

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

mraniki

The Brexit ‘red tape’ illusion has been exposed by the Tories’ CE mark climbdown | Business | The Guardian (amp.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/brexit

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Despite claims over taking back control, UK is forced to comply with rules on which it has no say

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] setInner234 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hate to be that person, but AMP links are not good. It's yet another one of Google's schemes to control the web.

As for the article: feels like everyone with half a brain knew this was going to happen and unfortunately that's 48% of eligible voters at the time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Would you please explain your reference to amp and google?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Google invented AMP.
It had specifications for a webpage to conform to.
In return, Google would serve a cached copy and rank your page higher - ie a bigger audience. So publishers had to play along.

This article has some overviews on it.

https://www.theregister.com/2017/05/19/open_source_insider_google_amp_bad_bad_bad/

AMP developers produced something that is bad for the open web ecosystem because it destroys three sacrosanct elements of the web: the URL, the open web standard of HTML, and the decentralisation of the web.

Whilst AMP is now open source, it's still Google.
I don't know that any other search engines recognise AMP.
I don't think I've ever seen an "Always AMP" browser extension (tho I have seen many "de-amp" extensions).

Personally , I will support the publishers by linking/sharing/viewing the actual article link instead of the AMP link.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Apologies, I didn't know this, I just thought it was served on a subdomain for some random reason and it didn't matter. I'll ensure my links are "clean" in future 🙂

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

An interesting article - thanks for the link. I'm not exactly sure what options I have now though: I don't use Google search, I don't use their browser (or any of their software) - am I good to go?

[–] setInner234 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is an old link, but contains all the information needed. They've watered it down a bit since, but you still see it pop up from time to time: https://www.theregister.com/2017/05/19/open_source_insider_google_amp_bad_bad_bad/

edit: oh, someone else posted the exact same article, haha. I didn't look at the context, just replied directly from my inbox. Well, I'm leaving it here, so everyone can see me embarrassing myself :)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

No need for feeling that - covers both bases an' all. So all good, thanks for taking the time.