this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
745 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59703 readers
5170 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Top Meta executive said the company's name change was a success because it beat out coverage of the 'Facebook Papers' revelations::Meta's Chris Cox explained to employees the company's rebrand succeeded in driving press coverage amid whistleblower disclosures.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you have a skill set that lets you choose between working an for an ethical company for 100k and working for an evil company for 200k, it's on you if you choose the latter.

[–] jarfil 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What if I pick the 100k one... then get sick, have medical bills, can't work anymore, and end up in debt? Because, let me tell you, being ethical only got me more insomnia.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What if I pick the 200k one and have to live with the fact that I made the world a worse place for everyone else? Being selfish is fine of course, but I don't even earn 50k, 100k would already be ridiculous. I can't imagine the difference between 100k and 200k being that big of an improvement to one's life to justify increasing the suffering of others so much.

[–] jarfil 2 points 1 year ago

Well, I figure out the difference between 100k and 200k in how many years would it take me to get those extra 100k... like, right now, some extra 100k would solve all my financial problems for the foreseeable future, even possibly for life (yeah, I might not have all that much life expectancy left).

Had I been more selfish when I had the chance, I'd be much better off now. The way things are, I'm also suffering while others are... suffering the same, just someone else got more selfish in my place, we won nothing.

[–] rambaroo 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Then how would the 200k job magically make things better? The kind of medical bills you're talking about aren't payable unless you're a 1%er. You're screwed either way. And I say that as someone who also has chronic insomnia.

[–] jarfil 1 points 1 year ago

100k is slightly more than what I'd need right now to stop worrying. Had I got that several years ago, chances are I wouldn't even get this sick in the first place, meaning that would likely be several times extra 100k... and it clearly didn't stop others from taking the high pay road, so being more ethical only screwed me, didn't even prevent others from getting screwed.