this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
708 points (93.1% liked)

Atheism

492 readers
2 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NocturnalMorning 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

“Yes, (…) [but] the chances of these all happening in real life are virtually zero.”

“(…) one of her eggs would have to produce, on its own, the biochemical changes indicative of fertilization, and then divide abnormally to compensate for the lack of sperm DNA.“

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That would never result in a viable human

[–] EtherWhack 15 points 1 year ago

And it would never be male without a "Y" chromosome

[–] NocturnalMorning -1 points 1 year ago

Yes, I read the article too.

[–] kylua 1 points 1 year ago

this is interesting. Thank you