this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
63 points (93.2% liked)

Games

32041 readers
1205 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Well there's always DLSS and FSR. I don't even use AA anymore cause DLSS Balanced looks so much better than even native resolution + 8x MSAA.

[–] beefcat 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

MSAA doesn’t do anything for modern games because just about every surface has multiple pixel shaders applied on top. This is why few games bother to support it.

[–] LouNeko 1 points 1 year ago

Yes I agree, I wrote another comment about how I think the prevalence of realistic foliage in modern games might have been the biggest factor in MSAAs abandonment.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

DLSS and especially FSR, are basically TAA repurposed for upscaling.

But contrary to the vast majority of TAA implementations, they are actually good.

[–] LouNeko 1 points 1 year ago

I wish could experience DLSS. I'm still rocking a 1080Ti, so no DLSS for me, only FSR. But, in my opinion, FSR is such a visual downgrade for a minuscule performance boost. Especially in PvP games, where you can get killed by a single pixel, playing at a curbed resolution is a dealbreaker. I've heard DLSS looks a lot better than FSR but I'm going to run the 1080Ti till it dies, since it still runs nearly everything maxed out at 1440p.