this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
285 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

55773 readers
3812 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago (4 children)

the 10% sounds like bait. Once they've got everyone on board and things are running smoothly (for them), it will be muuuch harder to resist.

[–] joe 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I'm not sure this is true (keep in mind: weak grasp). This 10% would push websites from specifically blocking untrusted clients-- but if they got rid of the 5%, it would not magically change all the websites to block untrusted clients. They'd still need to update to do this.

I don't want to come off like I'm defending this though-- I really just don't know enough to say.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The vast majority of them would not change the default, and a simple mandatory update would change that to 0% without them having to do anything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Do you think Google will implement this in the end?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

As soon as they are in a position to do it