this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
868 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

61904 readers
3331 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s
enu
technopagan
L4s
868
Thousands of authors demand payment from AI companies for use of copyrighted works (www.cnn.com)
submitted 2 years ago by L4s to c/technology
347 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Thousands of authors demand payment from AI companies for use of copyrighted works::Thousands of published authors are requesting payment from tech companies for the use of their copyrighted works in training artificial intelligence tools, marking the latest intellectual property critique to target AI development.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cactusupyourbutt 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

well no, because the summary is its own copyrighted work

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The published summary is open to fair use by web crawlers. That was settled in Perfect 10 v Amazon.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Right, but not one the author of the book could go after. The article publisher would have the closest rights to a claim. But if I read the crib notes and a few reviews of a movie... Then go to summarize the movie myself... That's derivative content and is protected under copyright.