Linux

48314 readers

83 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

111

Alpine Linux does not make the news (drewdevault.com)

submitted 1 year ago by pnutzh4x0r to c/[email protected]

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s just a general purpose distro…

What is the “real” purpose of Debian or Arch?

And it’s really not that niche - many Docker images are based on it, postmarketOS is based on it.

Also OpenBSD is not a distro, it’s a completely different OS.

[–] GustavoM -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What is the “real” purpose of Debian or Arch?

I should have been more clear -- Debian/Arch "just works" and (both low/mid/high users) do not need of anything beyond that. And both Alpine/OpenBSD do not provide an extra "need" to anything of what both Debian/Arch already does. Unless if Alpine and/or OpenBSD provides a feature that makes Arch/Debian obsolete in any way.... then yep, both will become more relevant.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Judging by various posts I’ve seen Arch and Debian both don’t “just work” for many users.

Also I really don’t get your point about providing a feature to make others “obsolete”… what do popular distros like Manjaro or Mint provide that make Arch/Ubuntu obsolete? And at least Manjaro has managed to be in the news quite a few times unfortunately.

The point of the article is that Alpine works, both on a technical level and as a project, without unnecessary drama.

I’d (mostly) say the same about OpenBSD too, btw.