this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
37 points (97.4% liked)

Formula 1

9100 readers
176 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


Rules


  1. Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
  2. No gambling, crypto or NFTs
  3. Spoilers are allowed
  4. Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
  5. Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
  6. Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
  7. Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

Up next


F1 Calendar

2024 Calendar

Location Date
πŸ‡ΆπŸ‡¦ Qatar 29 Nov-01 Dec
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ͺ Abu Dhabi 06-08 Dec

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Photographer 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Engine equalisation would cut development costs massively, figuratively speaking in any technology 95% of the performance is achieved with 50% of the budget, so the big spends are always on the tiny things that keep you ahead of the competition, if everyone is equalised then there is no reason to waste money on developments that get the extra 2 or 3 HP from the system.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This sounds so sensible that I am still shocked that Christian "It wasn't me" Horner has said it πŸ˜ƒ.

[–] Archive 2 points 1 year ago

I think Horner is for it because he knows it will harm the competitors more than Red Bull.

[–] SatouKazuma 3 points 1 year ago

Pareto efficiency for the win?