this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
47 points (96.1% liked)

Antiwork

8459 readers
3 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
47
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

My already soul-sucking job that has me carving out 9 hours a day just announced that going forward we're supposed to be dedicating an extra half hour and that this will be rigorously enforced with a clock-in/clock-out system (we didn't have one before), and I'm livid. Naturally, there's no mention of a pay increase or any such because apparently "this is what we should've been doing all along", even though we're paid peanuts and there's next to nothing by way of incentives or anything of the sort.

I worked my way up here precisely so I wouldn't have to be subject to this sort of Big Brother scrutiny and this is just beyond annoying.

/end rant

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you're salaried you may be able to justify that you're already working more then your contract states. Seen many companies implement a clock in clock out only for it to bite them in the ass when all the extra labor that the team is putting in suddenly vanishes. If you're hourly, just make sure that the company is paying out OT and they'll quickly realize how expensive this kind of BS policy is. At least that's the hope. Best of luck to you

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Sounds like OP is salary and in the worst of both worlds—no overtime, rigid time system.