Politics

1025 readers

2 users here now

@politics on kbin.social is a magazine to share and discuss current events news, opinion/analysis, videos, or other informative content related to politicians, politics, or policy-making at all levels of governance (federal, state, local), both domestic and international. Members of all political perspectives are welcome here, though we run a tight ship. Community guidelines and submission rules were co-created between the Mod Team and early members of @politics. Please read all community guidelines and submission rules carefully before engaging our magazine.

founded 2 years ago

120

Hunter Biden’s attorney files ethics complaint against Marjorie Taylor Greene for showing sexual images (thehill.com)

submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hunter Biden’s lawyer filed an ethics complaint against Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) Friday, requesting that an ethics watchdog “immediately” initiate a review of Greene’s conduct after she …

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

As repulsive a move as this is, I'm afraid that the DC law almost certainly won't apply in this case. This was done as part of her official "speech" as a representative.

The speech and debate clause, which appears in Article 1, section 6, of the U.S. Constitution, was written before the First Amendment and has a more limited scope.

The clause, whose inclusion reflected the development in England of an independent Parliament, states that “for any Speech or Debate in either House, they [members] shall not be questioned in any other Place.” It follows a provision, now largely moot, that prevents the arrest, for civil cases, of members traveling to or from sessions of Congress.

[–] instamat 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But what about the message she sent to the people on her email list? Surely that doesn’t have the same protections of the speech and debate clause.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Depends on what a court decides "in either house" to mean. Does it mean physically in the House or Senate chambers? Does it mean "in furtherance of their duties as a congressperson"? I know how I would rule, but I don't know how the Supreme Court would rule.

[–] instamat 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I don’t think anyone knows how the Supreme Court would rule these days.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My general rule of thumb is "whatever the conservatives want."

[–] instamat 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I hate so much that that’s true

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why do you hate that the court actually respects the constitution?

[–] instamat 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not so much that as the bribery and corruption allegations that a few of the justices have seen recently. That calls into question their integrity and objectivity.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago

Lol make up retarded allegations and then make up rules to punish people for them. Who's the corrupt one again?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago

In favor of the constitution