this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
18 points (90.9% liked)

flashlight

2887 readers
1 users here now

Portable illumination

Rules:

  1. Be excellent to each other
  2. Don't be the reason we need to make more rules

Related:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Around $50 depending on options!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] solrize 3 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Mfgr page: https://www.skilhunt.com/portfolio/h150-aa-14500-usb-magnetic-charging-led-headlamp/

AA/14500 dual fuel anglehead light, USB magnetic charger for 14500 only, wonder what happens if you try to charge an. AA. Wonder if there charge contacts spark if shorted on the outside of the light.

33g w/o battery, has 3 point headband, eh?

Complex, non Anduril UI. 650lm in CW on 14500, around 225lm on AA. Removable tailgate magnet. Has some kind of 55 day moon more. Wonder if that is AA only.

Overall imho: meh, ok light but I don't understand the excitement. Too much lumenitis in these lights anyway.

[–] DefeaterofDarkness 3 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Skilhunt has one of the least complex UI’s around. Press for on, hold to cycle modes, double press for turbo. Not sure if too many share you opinion of it being “complex”.

Not sure what “lumenitis” is, but most people are excited for the H150 because of the Nichia 519a in 4500k, Skilhunt build quality, and excellent drivers with flat regulation.

[–] Spicy3d 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Simple UI, flat regulation, 519a? What else could I possibly want??

[–] jerv 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd gladly trade the simple UI for a DWIM UI. If there were a blatant sign that I crossed the line between " thermally unsustainable" and "I can do this until I am about to swan-dive into LVP territory" then sure. As it stands, I think slightly better mode spacing is required.

That said, I think Skilhunt gets it less-wrong that the fanatically-worshipped Zebra UI. At least Skilhunt/ESKTE/Skeet puts their thermally-unsustainable modes in Turbo by default.

[–] solrize 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Idk about current zebtalight ui's but my H50 has simple L-M-H 3 level UI that is fine. I like the DWIM idea, that gradually tapers brightness for very long runtime as the battery depletes.

I'm on mobile rn, will reply to your other post later.

[–] jerv 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For me, DWIM means "bidirectional ramping mode" since I have yet to find a stepped-mode UI that has the spacing to get me the amount of like I need in a wide variety of situations, and few that allow me to dim a light without cycling through the higher modes first or power-cycling the light. Zebra's G5 is actually the furthest from DWIM since it has only 3 steps each with 2 sub-levels, and I never know what combination of presses and holds I need to get something that is closest to what I want/need. And G6/G7 are hard to program to choose up to 6 out of the 12 possible (often no-optimal) levels.

Part of why I fell down the rabbit hole is that I found that flashlights can do so much more than LMH. And it's easier to set Anduril to a 3-level stepped-mode operation than to get most non-Anduril lights to DWIM status.

[–] solrize 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hmm, ok, I tend to follow McGizmo's view that levels should be spaced 10x apart, so LMH=1,10,100 lumens suits me fine. But Anduril is almost a "software-defined flashlight", so if you prefer ramping then you also came to the right place.

I'm unfamiliar with the Zebralight G5 but I get the vibe that Zebralight had made poor decisions lately, so it fits. I try to refuse to buy non-Anduril microprocessor lights except the simplest ones. I'm not always successful at that, but I do try.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)