this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
62 points (98.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2377 readers
2146 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Democrats of all persuasions, even some centrists who have long been firmly anti-shutdown, feel that voting for a “clean” spending bill would be tacitly blessing Musk’s controversial work. Denying Republicans the votes they’ll need to keep the agencies open, they believe, would be the lesser evil.

“Nobody wants a shutdown, but they don’t feel like aiding and abetting what’s happening, with Musk and Trump taking a wrecking ball to health care in particular,” said one senior House Democratic aide, who like others I spoke to was granted anonymity to speak candidly about internal party conversations. “Why would we be complicit in that?”

A senior Democratic lawmaker was blunter: “At some point you’ve got to have a goddamn backbone. I am not giving them a blank check until September.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 19 hours ago

One of the weird parts of a government shutdown: The Office of Management and Budget decides what still gets paid, and is appointed by the president.

So when the government "shut down" under Obama and the troops still got bombs, but the FDA stopped routine food safety inspections, it was because the guy Obama appointed decided the former was essential and the latter was not.

If Trump's guy, Vaught decides to, he can literally just declare anything they wanted to fund essential.

Of course the alternative is the republicans doing the same thing, except with the democrat's cooperation.