this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
189 points (99.0% liked)

Ukraine

8961 readers
415 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

Matrix Space


Community Rules

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

πŸ’³ Defense Aid πŸ’₯


πŸ’³ Humanitarian Aid βš•οΈβ›‘οΈ


πŸͺ– Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] isableandaking 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It takes time and organization to transport weapon systems across the globe safely. He could have done more, he could have done 0 - it is slower when you make sure congress agrees and you are not breaking any laws, instead of writing out executive orders to rule by decree.

[–] PugJesus 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not saying he was worthless. But I am saying that he picked excessive caution over decisive action, and that has a price in blood - especially now that US aid is likely to dry up indefinitely.

I'm pissed at everything.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump takes decisive action.
It's a fucking rollercoaster.
Regardless of whether you agree with the policies or not, trump has threatened tariffs, postponed tariffs, upped tariffs. I suspect by the end of the week he will ease tariffs, as he realises he is tanking the US economy.

It's less of the immediate-gratification as "line goes up" of the stock market, but I suspect the fact that anyone relying on US arms is rapidly working on replacing said assets for something more reliable... I wouldn't be surprised if there were some u-turns on US foreign policy soon, as well. Then again, Russia seems to wholey own Trump. So, maybe not. Much harder to judge.

I don't want decisive action. I want fast action that is well reasoned, and can be obviously defended as being "a good thing"

[–] PugJesus 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would say Trump's action is less 'decisive' and more 'impulsive' for that very reason. He doesn't make decisions. He just reacts, usually to how much he's shat his diaper on a given day, or how badly he wants to impress Putin and other dictators.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

That's an excellent point.
I searched for the definition of "decisive":

Having the power or quality of deciding a question or controversy; putting an end to contest or controversy; final; conclusive.

I stand corrected.
Flip flopping on tariffs (etc) is not decisive. It ends fuck all.
It is absolutely impulsive.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago

Unless it's brown people. Then Biden just ignores Congress and gets arms to another country immediately