this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
480 points (99.0% liked)

World News

41864 readers
3855 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

*PM says Trump is trying to make it easier to annex Canada — but it won't work *

An unbowed Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Tuesday that Canada will hit back hard at the U.S. after President Donald Trump launched a North American trade war by slapping devastating 25 per cent tariffs on virtually all Canadian goods.

Speaking to reporters at a news conference on Parliament Hill, Trudeau said Trump is trying to prompt "a total collapse of the Canadian economy" because he thinks that will "make it easier to annex us."

But Trudeau said that will never happen because "when it comes to defending our great nation, there is no price we all aren't willing to pay."

Trudeau said Canada will not back down from a fight in the face of "completely bogus and completely unjustified" trade action that has the potential to ruin bilateral relations and prompt job losses, economic devastation and higher inflation on both sides of the border.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 141 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, it is also designed to collapse the US economy too.

But yeah. Trudeau's speech is 100% essential listening. It is so rare that a politician just tells it like it is and he completely did.

[–] Buffalox 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Trudeau’s speech is 100% essential listening.

A link to that would be appreciated.

[–] jandro -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're in the comments of this link asking for a link

[–] Buffalox 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That's just nonsense, the "link" in question was the speech by Trudeau.
"This" link is an article about it. Obviously the 2 are not the same thing.

I already answered I skimmed the article, and didn't see a link to the full speech. With these things links to short cutouts are not uncommon. And instead of EVERYBODY wasting time looking for it, I politely asked for the link.

I personally try to ALWAYS provide a link if I have it, for convenience in similar situations.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 22 hours ago

Google it, and get me a beer while you're at it.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] militaryintelligence 13 points 1 day ago

Cool, more assholes from reddit

[–] donuts 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Idk why you are getting downvoted, the speech is right in the article. People are lazy and expect shit to be handed to them even when the answer is one click away (the article).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Part of it is that I made the mistake of implying anyone should EVER read an article rather than just spamming memes and non sequitors based off keywords in the topic title. Why discuss current events when you can instead spam comments that you know will get you some precious gamefaqs karma?

But mostly it is highlighting how completely internet illiterate people are at this point. EVERYONE hates AI and The Everything Apps and what reddit/twitter/instagram (but never tiktok. tiktok is love. tiktok is life) shows them and so forth. But the moment you suggest that someone can control what they see or seek out information on their own? The (almost) decades of training and conditioning kicks in and people are just unreasonable for implying anything other than what the internet and the totally humans we are talking to shows us.

Which is especially frustrating when we are already seeing ai/deepfake driven discourse is accomplishing. It really is fucking terrifying that the response was that I am "full of shit" for implying an article about a topic might have an embed of the speech in question but also that there would be blind trust if I just linked to a random youtube.

I probably should have been nicer and not done the LMGTFY. But it was worth it just to watch someone's mind be blown because they had apparently never seen an LMGTFY shitpost before. And also... my general stance is that people who are willfully and aggressively ignorant deserve no respect. More flies with honey but... the flies are already morbidly obese diabetics so maybe a bit less honey is called for.

[–] donuts 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

rather than just spamming memes and non sequitors based off keywords in the topic title

Yeah I thought that was just reddit, but we do it over here too. Stupid thing is, the "karma" or whatever it's called on Lemmy isn't even displayed, so it doesn't do shit anyway.

I probably should have been nicer and not done the LMGTFY

I mean, maybe? I think if all the downvoters understood that the content in question was right there in the article, they would have been on your side. Instead, they just pile on and call you a meanie. Meh.

[–] Buffalox 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I looked but couldn't find it.
Your stupid link also doesn't work, shows an animation of a search without any result???
Thanks for being arrogant about it though.

Edit:
Oh the stupid page doesn't work in dark mode, and you have to wait for the idiotic animation: 🤡
I was politely asking for the link, no need for this bullshit!

You were the one who claimed it's a must see, and then not provide the link to see it!!!