1048
‘The tyranny of apps’: those without smartphones are unfairly penalised, say campaigners
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
1048 points (98.4% liked)
Technology
63188 readers
6540 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Still don't understand the logic of doing that.
It's like saying,
"Our website is nigh unusable, please install our app instead. We pinky promise our app works".
It's because you have control over your browser, but they control their app and all its trackers, ads, etc
Yep. They want you to use apps, cause all the permissions you give the app makes it much easier for them to harvest all your data for marketing and selling purposes.
That's exactly it. Easy to block ads and trackers on a website, but more difficult or impossible on some apps.
One of the banking apps won't show the total balance of the account unless I'm using the app. How ridiculous.
They know that a lot of people would rather have it work a little better by getting an app, if they keep reminding people it's an option.
Even if "better" is just lack of nags.
It's sad. We need a digital privacy law so that an app can't be more invasive than the website.
Well, they just swap nags from "download our app" to "rate our app" no matter what you do, you'll be nagged...