this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
145 points (100.0% liked)
Wikipedia
2136 readers
247 users here now
A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.
Rules:
- Only links to Wikipedia permitted
- Please stick to the format "Article Title (other descriptive text/editorialization)"
- Tick the NSFW box for submissions with inappropriate thumbnails
- On Casual Tuesdays, we allow submissions from wikis other than Wikipedia.
Recommended:
- If possible, when submitting please delete the "m." from "en.m.wikipedia.org". This will ensure people clicking from desktop will get the full Wikipedia website.
- Use the search box to see if someone has previously submitted an article. Some apps will also notify you if you are resubmitting an article previously shared on Lemmy.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So, a general strike is illegal in the USA.
But, remember the history of unions. The Luddites were textile workers who were upset that the mill and factory owners were breaking the law and denying their rights. With the government ignoring their rights and the owners trampling over them, the Luddites prepared to fight:
Then they broke things:
And they killed:
And the government killed them:
The point is, trade unions were a compromise. Get rid of trade unions and what you get instead is mob violence against factory owners. People die.
"Meet our demands or we're going to walk around outside holding signs instead of working."
vs.
"Meet our demands or we're kill you and destroy your equipment."
If a general strike is illegal, then why stop at a strike? "In for a penny, in for a pound."
If you read the last part of the explanation general strikes are official strikes of one union to support another, so general strikes are acceptable as long as it's not an official strike and can be organized by a union or group of people.
Sure, there are some technicalities. But, the whole "rule of law" hardly matters in the US these days. Most likely the Trump junta would declare any general strike to be illegal. After all, it involved "antifa", a known terrorist organization.
The general point is that the more that reasonable and measured dissent and protest are not allowed, the more pressure is going to build up, and eventually you're going to get chaotic and violent riots.
This is exactly why I think that this thought of a single day of "no spending" is complete and utter bullshit. It's a stop-gap that allows the elites to plan and workaround, plus it placates the complacent to get them back into their usual spending habits the very next day.
Doing a single day is essentially just punishing a corporation with a fine, which recent history shows is completely and utterly useless.
No, I am not OK with any of that. The time for being nice was over more than a decade ago. People that don't see this are only enabling the oligarchies to continue to grow.
To those that think I'm wrong about Feb 28th: Go ahead and be complacent, but you better stop complaining about how bad fascists are if you can't be bothered to change your habits and take away their power in the only way we can short of murder. Why wait until the 28th, and why stop on Mar 1st?
Yeah, a single day with no spending would only hurt small businesses that are very cash poor and can't afford any kind of interruption. A big company will just shrug it off.
Much better are targeted boycotts with no expiry date. For example, nobody should be buying any ULINE stuff ever again.