this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2025
541 points (98.6% liked)
Technology
63075 readers
6483 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I had never heard of it. From wiki
What the hell does hp see in this?
* Sigh. I know it's not the product, I know HP bought the IP. i can't see how there is any significant IP from this company in development of this product.
It has AI in the name.
Yep!
All the tech companies are invested in AI, and it's gloriously expensive to do from scratch. Instead, they'll drop $100 million to "stay relevant in today's climate" without doing any work.
Also “H” “P”
If nothing else, the list of customers who were interested enough to spend money on such a product might be valuable to them.
10,000 buyers. Yeah, no.
Even it was much higher, yeah no.
IP hoarding of products that may potentially be produced. Millions of dollars aren't a pocket change, but if anyone's going into this wearable AI bullshit, HP'd make a hole in their pockets. It's a low stakes conservative gamble 'just in case'.
I have a hard time seeing much patentable. They can't just patent 'wearable pin', it has to be much more specific.
Nintendo enters the chat
They probably have patented some underlying technology they spent time researching to make the product viable.
Sigh. I know it’s not the product, I know HP bought the IP. i can’t see how there is any significant IP from this company in development of this product.
Nothing, and that's why they are shutting it down. You should read the article, HP's comments on what they get from the acquisition are directly quoted in it.
Seriously?
Ok:
What the hell does hp see in IP in this?
Probably a new smart way to force sell you printer ink.
P.S. buy a Brother printer instead
Again, also nothing. Here, I'll just quote the quote for you.
They don't care about the IP or the hardware. They wanted the talent.
Again, seriously?
The article says they bought the IP. For someone so snarky you sure have it wrong. Now with a merger of fucking course you get employees with it, that's how it works. But Mr snark, the article says they bought it for the IP.
But let's talk business. Now what's a cheaper way if you want the employees? You offer them a job. Costs nothing. Most would be happy to take it. How many staff were even left, after the obvious product failure, layoffs, and the best people seeing the writing on the wall and leaving. You're gonna pay what at least a cool half million per employee? Talk about a finders fee, instead of just offering them a job.
Can't wait to see how you try to snark your way out of that. I probably won't respond, not worth it when you act like that.
Didn't mean to be so snarky mate. Have a good one.