this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2025
59 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

3835 readers
132 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Neither lowering fares or simply increasing enforcement can solve fare evasion alone. Investing in better services and winning public trust are just as important.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, I understood your point. I used "free" the same way you did. There was no need to move the goal posts. .

We tend to distrust "free".

How many "free' offers do you have in your inbox right now? How many do you think are scams? We assume there are some sort of hidden costs, or that the service is "worth what you paid". If it is offered "completely free", it will be broadly avoided.

When charged a token amount, we get the impression of value. A bargain.

The "penalty" for fare evasion should be the cop looking the other way, or handing out "$5" passes and asking them to "pay it forward".

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

We tend to distrust “free”.

I don't think so.

Most people understand that free stuff offered by for-profits is sketchy and deceitful, while free public services is just another way of saying taxpayer-supported.

Everybody knows - or at least should know - that a free Google account means Google is going to invade your privacy, while enrolling for free at the local community college or attending school is their right because they paid for it in their taxes.

At least outside the US, that's the deal most taxpayers understand they have with the state. In the US, people would like free public services but refuse to pay for it because communism or some equally stupid non-sequitur.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

No, you clearly don't understand their point. Because everybody (apart from lunatic libertarians) knows that when something is free because taxes pay for it, it's completely different from free-because-they-sell-your-data or "free"-but-it's-a-scam.