this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
-66 points (17.0% liked)
Technology
63633 readers
4296 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That is one bullshit headline. Forbes keeping the AI pump and dump scheme going.
TLDR: People correctly discerned that written responses were from an "AI" chatbot slightly less often than they correctly discerned that responses were from a psychotherapist.
"AI" cannot replace a therapist and hasn't "won" squat.
A bit disingenuous not to mention this part:
Patients explaining they liked what they heared - not if it is correct or relevant to the cause. There is not even a pipeline for escalation, because AIs don't think.
Exactly. AI chatbot's also cannot empathize since they have no self awareness.
but it can give the illusion of empathy, which is far more important.
You can't say "Exactly" when you tl;dr'd and removed one of the most important parts of the article.
Your human summary was literally worse than AI 🤦
I'm getting downvoted, which makes me suspect people think I'm cheerleading for AI. I'm not. I'm sure it sucks compared to a therapist. I'm just saying that the tl;dr also sucked.