this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
190 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

63107 readers
3572 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] answersplease77 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

because every dating app is 70% males, 25% trolls, 4% female chatbots, 0.9% trans, 0.1% females. and every single message with your match costs $10

[–] PrivacyDingus 23 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At least he kept it consistent with males

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I figure it's just as valid to be attracted to females vs. males (or any other option) as it's valid to be attracted to women vs. men (or any other option).

It's when you say "men blah blah blah and females blah blah blah" that you obviously think of the latter as unequal, and almost certainly lesser.

[–] VindictiveJudge 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Possibly to differentiate from the trans women, who were mentioned immediately prior?

[–] Valmond 3 points 1 week ago

Trans females!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

It sucks because dating apps are a pretty trash experience all around, and definitely have some fundamental demographic issues, but god damn do the incels go wild whenever the conversation comes up.

load more comments (4 replies)