this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
151 points (96.9% liked)

World News

33103 readers
599 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a frenzied effort to get more Europeans vaccinated, the EU spent an estimated €21.5bn (£17.9bn) on an exclusive deal with Pfizer for up to 1.8bn doses. The deal was secured by Von der Leyen after her text offensive, as she later told the New York Times in a flattering interview.

As an investigative reporter, I filed an access request under the EU’s freedom of information law to the messages shared between von der Leyen and Bourla. These messages, if we had them, might provide important insights into how the controversial life-saving vaccines deal came together. They might also help to answer questions such as why the EU became Pfizer’s single biggest customer but reportedly paid a much steeper price for this batch of vaccines compared with the first tranche of Covid shots it had bought.

There is a bigger principle at stake here, too: EU citizens have a right to know what was being negotiated on their behalf during a public health emergency. Did the contract involve too many doses of the vaccine bought at a fixed price, with no scope for a review as the pandemic developed?

But the commission refused the request to share the messages, claiming that the texts were “by [their] nature short-lived” and were not covered by the EU’s freedom of information law. The commission’s secrecy around its communications is so fiercely guarded that it is now defending its refusal to make the texts available in the EU court.

As things stand, any potentially controversial exchanges between EU officials and outside interests, including corporate lobbyists and authoritarian governments, can simply be moved to text or WhatsApp to dodge public scrutiny.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

Bernie has compromised on some issues, like a good politician should. Nearly everybody else has compromised their integrity and the offices they hold with corrupt behavior. There’s a huge difference.

Effective politics/government doesn’t exist without compromise. America was founded on compromises, some of which were morally reprehensible, some of which were just about the structure of the nation and its government. A huge caveat of course, is that compromise only works when there are at least two groups equally willing to concede something big enough to reach a resolution.

Without the ability to compromise all we’re left with is tyranny.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Compromising on monstrous things just makes you a monster. It does not make you better than anyone.

There is an objective base line of morality, crossing that is always bad, it's better to tear down the government or die than compromise that way.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 20 hours ago

Bernie has compromised on some final solutions.