this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2025
808 points (99.8% liked)

Steam

10808 readers
218 users here now

Steam is a video game digital distribution service by Valve.

Steam News | Steam Beta Client news

Useful tools:
SteamDB
SteamCharts
Issue tracker for Linux version of Steam

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Everyone is acting like this is purely for good intentions, but I'll point out they make most of their money from taking a cut of the sale price from games. Ad money probably would not go to them at all. This is almost certainly purely a business decision, not because they fundamentally don't like the concept or want to protect you from it.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 day ago

I honestly don't really care about Valve's motivations. It's a good decision. This kind of trash can take over and ruin an entire marketplace if you let it.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of course everything a company does is in the best interest of the company. Even as simple as "let's make excellent products with lifetime warrantees" benefits them by making people want to shop there.

But that doesn't mean it isn't a good thing when companies realise the customers best interest are also their best interest. We should encourage that, not scoff at it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Of course everything a company does is in the best interest of the company.

That is not true, but that is part of the problem and also why Steam is at least a little better for us customers. Most companies only do what is good for the stakeholders short term, Valve does what is good for the company/single owner long term. And happy customers are good long-term, but not so important short-term.

It is still capitalism, and thus still terrible. But a tiny bit less terrible.

[–] Jhex 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yes, when something half good finally happens, let's complain it probably didn't happen for better reasons

Why are we never happy again?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can be happy about a decision while still understanding the business rational behind it.

[–] Jhex 1 points 18 hours ago

OP didn't seem "happy"... in fact, they seemed mad people were happy and not outraged this one good step was here because it may have been made out of a business decision and not just Valve falling on its own sword (that's why I made the comment)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Removing choices to the consumer isn't good. It may sound like they're doing a good thing, but if a racing game can include non-intrusive ads and either make the game cheaper or make more content without harming the experience, that's good for the consumer. If a company makes a shitty ad ladden game, you can always just not buy it. They aren't defending you. They're defending their method of making money and ensuring you can't make money without paying them, while removing options for the consumer.

[–] Jhex 1 points 18 hours ago

the state of current gaming should be enough prove for you that no, people cannot just choose not to buy them... same as you can probably not avoid AI in anything new you buy, they put it everywhere and you either eat it or give up X thing you loved

[–] lefixxx 7 points 1 day ago

Maybe the look at the shitshow that is mobile gaming and they want to stay away from it. Good intention in my book.

[–] glitchdx 4 points 1 day ago

a good thing done for a shitty reason is still a good thing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Also known as free market capitalism 100% working as it should.