FediLore + Fedidrama

2159 readers

34 users here now

Rules

Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.
The poster must have a credible post and comment history before submitting a piece of history. This is to avoid sock-puppetry and witch hunts.

The usual instance-wide rules also apply.

Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)

Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.

Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc

(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama

Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse

Partners:

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

-14

Do you remember a few days ago when I asked if we could talk about things that happen outside the fediverse? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 4 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A few days ago, I asked if we could talk about things that happen outside the fediverse. I got a lot of different answers ranging from "yes" to "no" to "it depends". Hunting someone down somewhere and saying "ah ha I found Zezima on X" isn't the kind of thing I meant. This is.

That moment when an admin outright makes it absolutely clear if you read the room (those who remember past messages will be able to do that) that they're going around trying to get back at people and further complicate things for them, the instance in question being in spiteful response to a promotion. The incentive to weigh in is thus pre-existing, plus I am fediversally relevant because I have been accused of being them (not that I'm the only one), so I get the contagion.

It's a bit much.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If I may, having videos instead of text format isn't really the best way to convey your message

[+] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

I have zero opinion on any of this. I just looked at the modlog and wanted to point out that most of the bans are from .ml

It's basically a right of passage to get banned from .ml so I wouldn't take those as proof of character one way or the other.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

A person on DeviantArt wrote up an extensive run-down of this person if you want to go down a rabbit hole.

Definitely a rabbit hole. No time enough for now.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 days ago

If you want to know why I locked the discussion you mentioned, read the community rules. You say I falsely paint myself as a victim as if your whole existence here, which is a day old, doesn't 100% consist of attacks towards me. All the things you claim I am denying guilt of here that actually happened did so years ago, all of which have been compensated for in some way. Had you accused me of some of them at the time, you would have seen me oblige to what you say I haven't done, but here you all are threateningly following me everywhere trying to hold every single thing I've ever said or done against me because of your little grudge, all while making claims that I have been removed from places I haven't actually been removed from.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is that why you and your co-targeters have been banned from so many places hundreds of times, including some of the places that, if coming from you (even falsely), would be used to paint me as guilty? Is that why it's normal for you to go after people who actually take the time to analyze what's going on?